Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1650

reference
924-tree-1
name
1650
tree-preservation-order

undefined

924-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032350 50.875503)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032294 50.875497,-1.032296 50.875509,-1.032304 50.875519,-1.032316 50.875527,-1.032332 50.875532,-1.032350 50.875534,-1.032367 50.875532,-1.032383 50.875527,-1.032396 50.875519,-1.032404 50.875509,-1.032407 50.875498,-1.032405 50.875487,-1.032397 50.875477,-1.032384 50.875469,-1.032369 50.875464,-1.032351 50.875462,-1.032334 50.875464,-1.032318 50.875469,-1.032305 50.875476,-1.032297 50.875486,-1.032294 50.875497)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL